This woman, Beyoncé, Rhianna and Kanye made the Grammy’s, everyone else seemed to be octogenarians. As usual my kids started texting and fidgeting about 15 minutes in and then they were gone. That was a 50 year celebration? Herbie Hancock? Absolutely no alternative artists? Did I miss something?
Share this Post:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
This entry was posted
on Monday, February 11th, 2008 at 10:05 pm and is filed under Bad ass, Music, Television, Video.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
AP reports: “It’s down from the 20 million viewers who watched last year. The 2006 awards, with 17 million viewers, is the Grammy low point. The show had 17.3 million viewers in 1995.”
Justin swears Daft Punk were stunt doubles. Wha? Can this be confirmed?
The Beyoncé + Tina portion, unless on it’s way to becoming a Broadway musical, was incredibly silly.
Does anyone remember the hook to the Foo Fighters’ song? Me neither.
Finally, Tom Hanks was about as exciting as Dan Rather on valium. If not for March Madness I would be completely in favor of nuking CBS headquarters RIGHT NOW.
I’m doubting myself now… it might have actually been daft punk, I mean really why would they pass up the opportunity to play the grammy’s it just seemed really odd, Guy-Man is about a foot shorter than Thomas and they had flipped sides from their regular tour.
Speaking of the Amy Winehouse clip and her singing in her lower register: I aint heard of that many flat No’s since my last trip to the local boxing club. zing!
February 12th, 2008 at 6:07 am
I give myself credit - I didn’t even bother watching. Whats the point? This stuff always burns my ass.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:20 am
For whatever it’s worth, a tiny little birdie told me that Slayer won something…
February 12th, 2008 at 9:11 am
What are these “grammys?” Can I get a grammy? Will she make me cookies?
February 12th, 2008 at 10:47 am
Well, despite all their exclamations about “50 more years” I’m not sure that goal will be achieved…
February 12th, 2008 at 11:24 am
AP reports: “It’s down from the 20 million viewers who watched last year. The 2006 awards, with 17 million viewers, is the Grammy low point. The show had 17.3 million viewers in 1995.”
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hC8HGADj90cetm6O74orbIaykVEwD8UO8DD80
February 12th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
Justin swears Daft Punk were stunt doubles. Wha? Can this be confirmed?
The Beyoncé + Tina portion, unless on it’s way to becoming a Broadway musical, was incredibly silly.
Does anyone remember the hook to the Foo Fighters’ song? Me neither.
Finally, Tom Hanks was about as exciting as Dan Rather on valium. If not for March Madness I would be completely in favor of nuking CBS headquarters RIGHT NOW.
February 13th, 2008 at 12:12 am
I’m doubting myself now… it might have actually been daft punk, I mean really why would they pass up the opportunity to play the grammy’s it just seemed really odd, Guy-Man is about a foot shorter than Thomas and they had flipped sides from their regular tour.
weak weak show though when all is said and done.
February 13th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Pampelmoose bad one liner of the day:
Speaking of the Amy Winehouse clip and her singing in her lower register: I aint heard of that many flat No’s since my last trip to the local boxing club. zing!