<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Open Letter from OK Go to its Fans and EMI &#8211; Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pampelmoose.com/2010/01/an-open-letter-from-ok-go-to-its-fans-and-emi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pampelmoose.com/2010/01/an-open-letter-from-ok-go-to-its-fans-and-emi</link>
	<description>music . media . web. culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:16:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel F</title>
		<link>http://www.pampelmoose.com/2010/01/an-open-letter-from-ok-go-to-its-fans-and-emi/comment-page-1#comment-159694</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pampelmoose.com/?p=4004#comment-159694</guid>
		<description>Anyone have OkGo&#039;s publicist contact info? (request from music journalist)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have OkGo&#8217;s publicist contact info? (request from music journalist)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.pampelmoose.com/2010/01/an-open-letter-from-ok-go-to-its-fans-and-emi/comment-page-1#comment-159498</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pampelmoose.com/?p=4004#comment-159498</guid>
		<description>Since they are on a major, it is almost certain that their publicist WORKS at the label, and they likely want to down-play the &quot;tiff&quot; and capitalize on the &quot;open-letter&quot;. I could be wrong, but it&#039;s probably just a case of damage / spin-control here, with them trying to make the best of the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since they are on a major, it is almost certain that their publicist WORKS at the label, and they likely want to down-play the &#8220;tiff&#8221; and capitalize on the &#8220;open-letter&#8221;. I could be wrong, but it&#8217;s probably just a case of damage / spin-control here, with them trying to make the best of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cupcakes</title>
		<link>http://www.pampelmoose.com/2010/01/an-open-letter-from-ok-go-to-its-fans-and-emi/comment-page-1#comment-159415</link>
		<dc:creator>Cupcakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pampelmoose.com/?p=4004#comment-159415</guid>
		<description>Problems with EMI? Who doesn&#039;t have problems with a major label. That said, it&#039;s like any other business, you gotta know who is in charge or who can convince whomever is in charge and then you might have a fighting chance. Sure they had 40 million plus hits... no one ever talks about the fact that the album that song was on only sold 29k copies. Blame management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problems with EMI? Who doesn&#8217;t have problems with a major label. That said, it&#8217;s like any other business, you gotta know who is in charge or who can convince whomever is in charge and then you might have a fighting chance. Sure they had 40 million plus hits&#8230; no one ever talks about the fact that the album that song was on only sold 29k copies. Blame management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.pampelmoose.com/2010/01/an-open-letter-from-ok-go-to-its-fans-and-emi/comment-page-1#comment-159397</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pampelmoose.com/?p=4004#comment-159397</guid>
		<description>@Carri - In principle you are correct.  However, what *is* better business is how the headlines sound when they&#039;re reported.  If the reporter can give that flashy &quot;40 million hits on one posting alone&quot; soundbite, it&#039;s way more attention-getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carri &#8211; In principle you are correct.  However, what *is* better business is how the headlines sound when they&#8217;re reported.  If the reporter can give that flashy &#8220;40 million hits on one posting alone&#8221; soundbite, it&#8217;s way more attention-getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carri Bugbee</title>
		<link>http://www.pampelmoose.com/2010/01/an-open-letter-from-ok-go-to-its-fans-and-emi/comment-page-1#comment-159394</link>
		<dc:creator>Carri Bugbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pampelmoose.com/?p=4004#comment-159394</guid>
		<description>This was an interesting part of the letter:

&quot;it tends to do our business more good to get 40 million hits on one site than 1 million hits on 40 sites&quot;

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a factual basis for assuming that more hits on fewer sites is better for marketing. In fact, I would say just the opposite. Being on a variety of sites would expose artists to a wider variety of customers/fans.

@CarriBugbee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an interesting part of the letter:</p>
<p>&#8220;it tends to do our business more good to get 40 million hits on one site than 1 million hits on 40 sites&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a factual basis for assuming that more hits on fewer sites is better for marketing. In fact, I would say just the opposite. Being on a variety of sites would expose artists to a wider variety of customers/fans.</p>
<p>@CarriBugbee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

